Legal Implications of Video Surveillance on Transit Systems (2018) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 3-5
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 3... ...
3LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF VIDEO SURVEILLANCE ON TRANSIT SYSTEMS By Larry W Thomas, The Thomas Law Firm, Washington, DC I
|
From page 4... ...
4The transit agencies' responses identified the areas, facilities, and equipment that are subject to video, as well as audio, surveillance.16 For example, the Department of Transportation and Public Works (DTPW) in Miami identified the [p]
|
From page 5... ...
5on the limits of video surveillance,25 but apparently no court has held that the use of video surveillance by law enforcement or other agencies to monitor activity on public property is an unreasonable search or otherwise violates the Fourth Amendment or a right to privacy.26 Part VI discusses whether there are federal and state statutes that apply to video surveillance, and more specifically, to transit agencies' use of video surveillance. The Privacy Act of 197427 applies to federal agencies' collection of information on individuals and regulates the agencies' release of data, particularly of personally identifiable information (PII)
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.